WattsUp
Well-known member
I originally posted this in another topic here, but though it might be useful to elevate to its own discussion:
----
A positive status does NOT indicate regen. This is a very common misconception.
Now, regen can certainly contribute to having a positive status, but remember that the "status number" in the FFE display is simply the difference between what the original range estimate was (when you turned the car on) and what the current range estimate is (now that the car has been driving along for a while). That's it. It's just a subtraction, and it is constantly varying as you drive, depending on how you drive.
Your driving style and the current driving conditions are the primary inputs that affect the status, not regeneration. A big status number doesn't necessarily indicate that a lot of regen has occurred.
Consider this: If you were to drive perfectly steady on level ground, but very slowly (which uses much less energy per mile than driving fast) your status will start to go up, and possibly positive. Conversely, if you were to start driving very fast, or drive up hill (which uses much more energy per mile than driving slowly) your status will start to go down, and possibly negative.
On my mountain trip documented here, I covered so many miles (doing down hill) near the end of my trip where a very small amount of net energy was being used per mile (because so much of my energy usage was being offset by regen) that the algorithm correctly started estimating that I could continue for another 155 miles under those conditions. I say "correct" because the algorithm is "stupidly" logical. If there were another 155 miles of the same downhill driving, I'm sure that I could have, in fact, traveled that far.
In my case, yes, regen was an important factor in the crazy big range estimates I got, but only in that the plentiful downhill regen significantly changed the net energy used per mile, causing the range estimate to change drastically.
So, the "guess-o-meter" behavior can be confusing, misleading, mysterious, etc.. But, once you know how it works (it's just math) it is a little easier to cope with. Obviously, the "real" number to go by is the percentage of charge. That, combined with driver experience (i.e., "getting to know" what the FFE can do with that charge).
----
Btw, you can also see the actual miles regenerated in the "trip summary" displayed on the left-hand dash area whenever you turn the car off. It will often be a surprisingly small number (and usually have very little to do with the status).
----
A positive status does NOT indicate regen. This is a very common misconception.
Now, regen can certainly contribute to having a positive status, but remember that the "status number" in the FFE display is simply the difference between what the original range estimate was (when you turned the car on) and what the current range estimate is (now that the car has been driving along for a while). That's it. It's just a subtraction, and it is constantly varying as you drive, depending on how you drive.
Your driving style and the current driving conditions are the primary inputs that affect the status, not regeneration. A big status number doesn't necessarily indicate that a lot of regen has occurred.
Consider this: If you were to drive perfectly steady on level ground, but very slowly (which uses much less energy per mile than driving fast) your status will start to go up, and possibly positive. Conversely, if you were to start driving very fast, or drive up hill (which uses much more energy per mile than driving slowly) your status will start to go down, and possibly negative.
On my mountain trip documented here, I covered so many miles (doing down hill) near the end of my trip where a very small amount of net energy was being used per mile (because so much of my energy usage was being offset by regen) that the algorithm correctly started estimating that I could continue for another 155 miles under those conditions. I say "correct" because the algorithm is "stupidly" logical. If there were another 155 miles of the same downhill driving, I'm sure that I could have, in fact, traveled that far.
In my case, yes, regen was an important factor in the crazy big range estimates I got, but only in that the plentiful downhill regen significantly changed the net energy used per mile, causing the range estimate to change drastically.
So, the "guess-o-meter" behavior can be confusing, misleading, mysterious, etc.. But, once you know how it works (it's just math) it is a little easier to cope with. Obviously, the "real" number to go by is the percentage of charge. That, combined with driver experience (i.e., "getting to know" what the FFE can do with that charge).
----
Btw, you can also see the actual miles regenerated in the "trip summary" displayed on the left-hand dash area whenever you turn the car off. It will often be a surprisingly small number (and usually have very little to do with the status).