michael
Well-known member
I have been noticing some reduction in available energy from the expected 19.5 kWh, and I was wondering whether it represented battery degradation or possibly some other effect. The most likely seemed the frigid (50 to 60 F) temperatures we have been experiencing here in Los Angeles.
I was curious about the expected effect on battery capacity over a moderate range. Panasonic publishes
https://www.panasonic.com/industrial/includes/pdf/ACA4000CE254-NCR18650A.pdf
the data sheet on a battery that I believe is somewhat similar (not identical) to that in the FFE. According to posts on the Tesla forum, this particular battery is very similar to that used in the Tesla.
Refer to the chart labelled "discharge characteristics (various)" This shows the discharge at various temperatures, and conveniently at 25 C (77 F) and 10 C (50 F). It also happens to be at the 1 hour rate, which represents freeway speeds.
At 25 C (77 F)
End point = 3000 mAh
90% discharge (which is probably about where the FFE reports end) = 2700 mAh
Midway to 90% = 1350 mAh, where the Voltage is 3.45
Approximate usable energy = 3.45 x 2.7 = 9.3 Wh
At 10 C (50 F)
End point = 2750 mAh
90% discharge (which is probably about where the FFE reports end) = 2475 mAh...call it 2500
Midway to 90% = 1250 mAh, where the Voltage is 3.4
Approximate usable energy = 3.4 x 2.5 = 8.5 Wh
8.5/9.3 = 91%
So these particular batteries (and by proxy, the FFE battery pack) loses 9% of capacity between 77 and 50 F. If we assume the nominal usable capacity is 19.5, it wouldn't be surprising to have only 17.7 at 50 F
The above assumes that the FFE batteries act in a manner generally similar to the particular Panasonic batteries examined, and that the TMS doesn't become active at or above 50 F.
Does this seem reasonable? Anyone see a flaw in this logic?
I was curious about the expected effect on battery capacity over a moderate range. Panasonic publishes
https://www.panasonic.com/industrial/includes/pdf/ACA4000CE254-NCR18650A.pdf
the data sheet on a battery that I believe is somewhat similar (not identical) to that in the FFE. According to posts on the Tesla forum, this particular battery is very similar to that used in the Tesla.
Refer to the chart labelled "discharge characteristics (various)" This shows the discharge at various temperatures, and conveniently at 25 C (77 F) and 10 C (50 F). It also happens to be at the 1 hour rate, which represents freeway speeds.
At 25 C (77 F)
End point = 3000 mAh
90% discharge (which is probably about where the FFE reports end) = 2700 mAh
Midway to 90% = 1350 mAh, where the Voltage is 3.45
Approximate usable energy = 3.45 x 2.7 = 9.3 Wh
At 10 C (50 F)
End point = 2750 mAh
90% discharge (which is probably about where the FFE reports end) = 2475 mAh...call it 2500
Midway to 90% = 1250 mAh, where the Voltage is 3.4
Approximate usable energy = 3.4 x 2.5 = 8.5 Wh
8.5/9.3 = 91%
So these particular batteries (and by proxy, the FFE battery pack) loses 9% of capacity between 77 and 50 F. If we assume the nominal usable capacity is 19.5, it wouldn't be surprising to have only 17.7 at 50 F
The above assumes that the FFE batteries act in a manner generally similar to the particular Panasonic batteries examined, and that the TMS doesn't become active at or above 50 F.
Does this seem reasonable? Anyone see a flaw in this logic?