hybridbear
Well-known member
Your conclusions are very similar to mine. We looked at a new 2014 but no local dealers were interested in ordering one for us for less than MSRP and I tried contacting about a dozen out of state dealers in CA, OR, WA & GA and none of them were willing to go much below MSRP for the lease, thus we ended up with this one.Kakkerlak said:This looks like a pretty good lease for a 2013 Focus Electric.
The differences between that lease and a current one would be that the MSRP has dropped from 39,995 to 35,995 (including $825 Destination fee), and the incentive has changed from $12,750 to $11,750.
With a residual value of $18445, that's about 45% if you calculate it on the Gross Capitalized Cost. I was offered 40% on 15,000 miles, and 43% on 10,500 miles. They may have adjusted the residual to decrease the payments.
In my opinion the Destination Charge ($825) is part of the price of the car but the Lease Acquisition Fee is just a bank charge and has nothing to do with the value of the car and shouldn't be included in the basis for the residual. I could be wrong on that.
A "rent charge" of just $207.91 is super-low interest. It's just 208/36 = $5.77 per month so it's probably on an interest rate of 0.25 %.
Overall, I'd say the car cost $3000 more in 2013, but the original owner put in about $2400 in cash and trade-in, so you're very close to what you would have paid on a new 2014, plus you're only obligated to 2 years and you got a higher residual.
So the direct answer is "the original owner did OK", especially with the interest rate.
I'm just glad that there's no disposition fee at the end of the lease. The Prius lease had one of those which is now the burden of someone else to pay.